All Things Newz
Law \ Legal

Due Process No Bar To Alter Ego Action – Shareholders


To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on

In a decision published on Wednesday, the California Court of
Appeal held that a defendant’s due process rights do not
protect the sole shareholder of a corporation from an alter ego
action.  Lopez v. Escamilla,  Cal. Ct.
Appeal Case No. B316800 (June 7, 2022).  The basic factual and
procedural background of the case are straightforward:

The creditor of a corporation obtains a default judgment against
the corporation for $157,370. The corporation has no funds or
assets and has been suspended by the Department of
Corporations.  The creditor then sues the sole shareholder of
the corporation for $157,370.

It is important to note that this case did not involve a
proceeding in which a judgment creditor moved to summarily add
someone to a previously entered default judgment.  The
creditor in this case filed a complaint against the alleged alter
ego in which he will have the opportunity to answer, engage in
discovery and file pre-trial motions.  

There is one rather glaring error in the Court’s opinion (at
least to my eye).   The Department of Corporations does
not have the authority to “suspend” corporations.  A
corporation may be suspended or forfeited for three reasons:

  • By the Secretary of State failure to file a Statement of

  • By the Secretary of State in the case of a domestic or foreign
    corporation, for failure to reimburse the Victims
    of Corporate Fraud Compensation Fund (VCFCF)
    a paid claim; and/or

  • By the Franchise Tax Board for failure to meet tax requirements
    (e.g., file a return, pay taxes, penalties, interest).

None of these involve the Department of Corporations which is
now known as the Department of Financial Protection &

The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.

POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Corporate/Commercial Law from United States

Staking A Climate Claim

Morrison & Foerster LLP

Companies are under more pressure than ever from investors, customers, partners, and the public to reduce their carbon footprint.

Whose Law Applies To LLC Alter Ego Claims?

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP

In a recent ruling, U.S. District Court Judge Dale A. Drozd applied California law to the determination of which law to apply to an alter ego claim…


Source link

Related posts

SEC Proposes To Clear-Up Clearing Agencies’ Governance To Mitigate Directors’ Potential Conflicts Of Interest – Securities

Ninth Circuit Holds That Social Media Communications Can Satisfy Statutory-Seller Requirement Under Securities Act – Securities

D.C. Passes Initiative Eliminating Lower Minimum Wage For Tipped Workers – Employee Benefits & Compensation