All Things Newz
Law \ Legal

Is lying on your tax returns a crime? – White Collar Crime, Anti-Corruption & Fraud

To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on


Lodging inaccurate or dishonest tax returns or business activity
statements with the Australian Taxation Office is a criminal
offence warranting serious penalties ranging from 1 to 10 years
imprisonment and heavy fines. These are also considered a type of

white collar crime

For more on tax fraud laws, speak to our
tax fraud lawyers
. This article is not to be taken as legal


The Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions
(‘CDPP’) prosecutes taxation fraud matters, which are
referred to them by the Australian Taxation Office

Whilst the ATO is able to prosecute straight-forward regulatory
offences under taxation legislation, defended or more serious
matters will most often be referred to the CDPP.

How Often Does the ATO prosecute Tax Evasion

In the period of 2020-21, summary prosecutions by the ATO
resulted in 200 successful prosecutions, 192 criminal convictions,
reparation orders of $56,499 and fines of $1.65 million.


The below table are some common tax evasion offences prosecuted
in Australia under the schedule to the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth)
(‘the Criminal Code’).

Offence Penalty Section
Obtaining Financial Advantage by Deception 10-years imprisonment section 134.2
General Dishonesty 10-years imprisonment section 135.1
Obtaining Financial Advantage 1-year imprisonment section 135.2
Conspiracy to Defraud 10-years imprisonment section 135.4
False or misleading statements 1-year imprisonment section 136.1
False or misleading information 1-year imprisonment section 137.1
False or misleading documents 1-year imprisonment section 137.2


The Government has power to impose penalties against
corporations and/or people who evade tax in its various forms under
the Taxation Administration Act 1996 (NSW). The below
table outlines the applicable penalties you can face if guilty of
the following tax evasion offences.

Offence Individual Penalty Corporation Penalty Section
Knowingly giving false or misleading information $11,000 $55,000 s55
Deliberately omitting information $11,000 $55,000 s56
Failure to Lodge Documents $11,000 $55,000 s57
Falsifying or Concealing Identity $11,000 $55,000 s58

It is a defence to the above offences if you took reasonable
care to comply with the requirement or the contravention of the
requirement was caused solely because of circumstances beyond your
control. This defence is available in section 59 of the
Taxation Administration Act 1996 (NSW).


The below are the penalties for some common tax evasion offences
under the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth).

Offence Penalty Section
Failure to comply with requirements under tax law $4,440 (Court can double this) s8HA
False or misleading statement $4,440 s8K
Recklessly making false or misleading statements $6,660 s8N

Making a false tax declaration, without reasonable excuse, is an
offence as per section
of the Tax Administration Act 1953 (Cth).

An offence is committed where a person makes a statement to a
taxation officer, which is false or misleading.

The ATO has specified three categories, which depend on the
level of deception involved, including:

  1. Failure to take reasonable care: where you have not done what a
    reasonable person in the same circumstances would have done
    (maximum penalty = 25% of the shortfall, or a fine of $4,440).

  2. Recklessness: where a reasonable person would have been aware
    of a real risk that the declaration was false or misleading, and
    you disregarded that risk (maximum penalty = 50% of the shortfall,
    or a fine of $8,880).

  3. Intentional disregard: where you intentionally disregarded the
    law with the intention of bringing about certain results such as
    underpaying tax or gaining an entitlement (maximum penalty = 75% of
    the shortfall, or a fine of $13,320).

The ‘shortfall’ refers to the difference between a
person’s correct tax liability or entitlement, and the tax
liability or entitlement determined using false or misleading
information provided.

Penalty amounts may be reduced or increased if there are
aggravating or mitigating circumstances.

Aggravating circumstances include obstructing the ATO’s
investigation, or failing to alert the ATO, where you are aware
that you have made a false or misleading tax declaration.

Mitigating circumstances include where a person cooperates with
the ATO, alerts them to the error, or where the penalty imposed
would be unjust in the circumstances.

A defence may be provided under ‘safe harbour’, which is
applicable where:

  1. the statement was made by a registered agent,

  2. the agent was provided with all relevant information to make
    the statement correctly,

  3. the false or misleading statement resulted from the agent
    failing to take reasonable care.

In the period of 2020-21, the ATO referred
20 tax crime
cases to the CDPP, resulting in 20 criminal
convictions, 12 sentences of imprisonment, reparation orders
totalling $550,000 and $56,000 of fines.

The Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) contains
multiple offences
, which may be applied to taxation fraud.

One of the main offences with which those who are alleged to
have engaged in taxation fraud are charged with is
obtaining financial advantage, by deception, against

Commonwealth entity
, as per section

The maximum penalty applicable is 10 years imprisonment.

The prosecution must prove, beyond reasonable doubt, that:

  1. The accused’s conduct involved deception, which resulted in
    financial advantage,

  2. The financial benefit was received from a Commonwealth entity,
    such as the ATO or Centrelink,

  3. The accused’s conduct was dishonest, such as where they
    were aware that they were not entitled to make a claim, what they
    were doing was wrong,

  4. The accused, at the time of their conduct, knew that there was
    a substantial risk that they would benefit financially, yet

Dishonesty is defined by the Act, as dishonest according to the
standards of ordinary people, and known by the accused person to be
dishonest according to those standards of ordinary people.

Deception can involve intentional or reckless deception, and can
be via words or other conduct, including via electronic means.

There is an alternative offence within section 135.2(1),
labelled ‘obtaining financial advantage from commonwealth
entity’, which carries a considerably lower maximum penalty of
12 months imprisonment.

The prosecution must prove, beyond reasonable doubt, that:

  1. The accused’s conduct results in them receiving a financial
    advantage from a Commonwealth entity, such as the ATO or Centrelink
    Centrelink fraud
    ), and

  2. The accused, at the time of their conduct, knew that they were
    not eligible to receive the financial advantage.


People get caught for lying on tax returns or tax evasion
through tip offs from members of the community. People may give the
ATO a tip off through the ATO Tax Integrity Centre via their
website or their tip off hotline on 1800 060 062.

Another method in which people get caught is through the Serious
Financial Crimes Taskforce led by the ATO joint agency to address
very serious types of tax frauds across Australia. It was
established on 1 July 2015.

The Serious Financial Crimes Taskforce main focus is tax evasion
offshore, serious financial crime regarding COVID, cybercrime
relating to tax and superannuation, and illegal phoenix. The
taskforce also consists of other agencies including AFP, CDPP ACIC

Source link

Related posts

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act And Convenience Fees – Financial Services

Hong Kong Government Lifts Compulsory Quarantine Requirement – What Employers Need To Know – Health & Safety

SEC Division Of Corporation Finance To Add Industry Offices Focused On Crypto Assets – Fin Tech