All Things Newz
Law \ Legal

Trump Compared The FBI Search Of Mar-a-Lago To Watergate, But Experts Say That Framing Isn’t Correct – Terrorism, Homeland Security & Defence



To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Brandon Van Grack spoke to USAToday about the FBI
search of former President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home as part of
an investigation into allegations of classified documents being
illegally removed from the White House.

“The fact that they obtained a search warrant and knew what
to look for suggests that the FBI has conducted numerous
interviews. Which is all to say that there is a very real risk of
criminal charges,” said Brandon.

While mishandling classified information, specifically statute
18 U.S. Code 1924, has a maximum penalty of five years of
imprisonment, Brandon continued, there is “still a very high
hurdle” to criminally prosecuting a former president for
violating it.


Read the article (subscription may be
required).

Because of the generality of this update, the information
provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should
not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular
situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Government, Public Sector from United States



Source link

Related posts

Laws relating to vexatious proceedings and vexatious litigants in NSW – Court Procedure

Horace Hayward

Public Disclosure vs. Confidentiality Protection: The FCA Finds The Proper Balance – Patent

Horace Hayward

Future of work in Australia: Jobs and Skills Summit – Government Policy & Public Finance

Horace Hayward