All Things Newz
Law \ Legal

Walmart’s Fudge Mint Class Action Permanently Dismissed – Class Actions

To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on

  • On August 23, an Illinois federal judge dismissed a putative class action lawsuit
    against Walmart over its fudge mint cookies (subscription to Law360 required). The plaintiff Eugene DeMaso
    claimed that the product label was misleading because the cookies
    did not contain fudge made from dairy fats or actual mint leaves.
    However, U.S. District Judge Charles R. Norgle held that the label
    was not misleading because no consumer expects the fudge to be made
    with dairy fats, or that the mint refers to anything other than a

  • DeMaso had alleged that fudge must contain dairy ingredients as
    its source of fat, but that the Walmart cookies contain only
    vegetable oils. DeMaso’s allegation was largely based on his
    own definition of fudge. However, the definition of
    “fudge” was not at issue but what a reasonable consumer
    expects fudge to mean. Judge Norgle held that DeMaso did not
    plausibly allege that reasonable consumers would expect fudge to
    contain fat from dairy ingredients rather than vegetable

  • DeMaso also argued that the declaration of the word
    “mint,” pictures of mint leaves, and green packaging led
    consumers to believe the cookies contained mint as an ingredient.
    However, Walmart suggested that absent words such as “made
    with mint,” a reasonable consumer would only conclude that the
    cookies tasted like mint. Agreeing with Walmart, the court found
    that mint is most commonly associated with flavor, and that
    reasonable consumers would read the mint representation as a flavor
    and it would be unreasonable and fanciful to conclude

  • DeMaso sought to pursue his claims on behalf of a class of
    Illinois consumers, as well as consumers in 25 other states. The
    case was dismissed with prejudice.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.

POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration from United States

2022 Liquor Liability Laws – A 50-State Survey

Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP

The 2022 Liquor Liability Laws, 50-State Survey, addresses the various issues present in this class of business through a review of Dram Shop statutes…

Getting Cross-Examination Right

Gentry Locke

Cross-examination can determine whether you win or lose your case. It’s a crucial opportunity to reinforce advantageous points and undermine problematic ones.

No Work Product Privilege Among Potential Adversaries

Morvillo Abramowitz Grand Iason & Anello

When parties with a common interest share attorney work product with each other in anticipation of litigation, the parties often expect that the work product will be immune from disclosure in the subsequent litigation.

Car Accidents And Third-Party Liability

Ward and Smith, P.A.

Generally, the thought of a car accident brings to mind a victim and an at-fault driver.
The at-fault driver, however, may not be the only cause of the accident.

Source link

Related posts

The Threshold For Setting Aside An Arbitral Decision Remains High – Arbitration & Dispute Resolution

The Year In Review- An Annual Publication Of The ABA/Section Of International Law: International Tax 2021 – Tax Authorities

Kidnap charges in New South Wales – Crime